BBC’s Michael Buerk – “The Loathesome Corner With Paedophiles And Climate Change Deniers”
Posted by Tory Aardvark
The BBC propaganda arm of the Church of Climatology and paid for by pain of law by us, had virtually no credibilty left in matters of Climate Change. After Michael Buerk’s statement about “the loathsome corner with paedophiles and Climate Change Deniers”, the BBC can be seen only as blinkered and totally biased towards the biggest scam in history, Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Now before the apologists and bleeding heart do gooders start on this is being taken out of context, he didn’t mean it, then the immedaite question is why did he say it?
Simple, it’s called guilt by assocaition, or more commonly the standard Lefttard tactic of if you fling enough shit, some will eventually stick. The left and their warming alarmists comrades call us Climate Change Deniers, the link being with Holocaust denial. Quite where they get off linking the greatest human tradegy of the 20th Century with a disbelief in junk science, is anyone’s guess.
Enough is enough, we pay for the BBC, we pay this idiot Buerk’s salary:
Why single out people that have the idea that ‘climate science’ is uncertain and politicised. Recently many scientists have said that over hyping of doom and gloom and unrealistic scenarios by lobby groups has not helped.
People can believe in any religion they like in this country, with some very strange ideas (in my mind) yet they are respected. Even a creationist (of the Earth was created 6,000 years ago kind) whilst many might think then ‘anti-science’, would never be associated or labbeled as in the same loathesome corner as paedophiles, and racists.
Not even Gordon Brown’s ‘flat earther’ ‘anti-science’ description of the denial of climate sceptics, or Ed Milliband’s ‘climate sabatouers’ went as far as putting people into the same category as paedophiles and racists.
Even IF anyone could find a TRUE climate Change deniar, – ie ‘the climate does not change for any reason it is static’, would they be that loathsome?
What is a ‘climate change deniar’ anyway?
1. Someone who denys that the planet has a climate that changes in the Earth’s history?
2. Someone that denies that the world has wammed since the last ice age.
3. Someone that denies that the world has warmed since the end of the little ice age.
4. Someone that denies that in the last 2 hundred years that there has been a rising trend in temperature, with 20-30 year periods of high rates of warming and cooling.
5. Someone that questions that the late 20th century warming is definetly due to humans producing CO2. (the IPCC only say likely due)
6. Someone that questions catstrophic predictions of 2o foot sea level rises, tipping points, global climate disruption, etc,etc
Or is it just a phrase, that can be used to mean what ever the person saying it chooses it to mean, to shut down any debate at any particular moment in time?H/T Climate Depot
The BBC have done themselves do favours and if indeed Buerk was being ironic as Archbishop Cranmer believes it still does leave one question:
But His Grace still has a question: If a qualified doctor and government adviser (unpaid) can be humiliatingly dismissed for having co-authored a paper in which a reasoned correlation was drawn between homosexuality and paedophilia, why should BBC employees (paid by the taxpayer) remain in their jobs when, according to Michael Buerk, they clearly hold the view that climate-change deniers and multiculuralist sceptics are as perverted in their beliefs as paedophiles?
About Tory AardvarkClimate Realist, Conservative and proud NRA member. I don't buy into the Man Made Global Warming Scam, science is never settled. http://toryaardvark.com @ToryAardvark on Twitter ToryAardvark on Facebook
Posted on February 12, 2011, in Anthropogenic Global Warming, BBC, Cancun COP16, Church Of Climatology, Climategate, COP16, Copenhagen COP15, ManBearPig, Oh FFS, Social Engineering and tagged Anthropogenic Global Warming, BBC Smears and Lies, Biased BBC, Church of Climatology, Michael Buerk. Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.