Ten Years On, Er What Happend To The Global Warming?

NASA satellite instruments precisely measuring global temperatures show absolutely no warming during the past the past 10 years

The doomsday scenario predicted by the warming alarmists is upon us, global greenhouse gas emissions have risen faster than Climate Comedy Central, sometimes know as the IPCC have predicted; this shocking increase in emissions should have everyone cowering in fear and converting to the Church of Climatology.

One small problem here people, what ever happened to the rise in global temperatures that this increase in CO2 is supposed to cause?

During the last 10 years the temperature of our world has not increased:

Global greenhouse gas emissions have risen even faster during the past decade than predicted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other international agencies. According to alarmist groups, this proves global warming is much worse than previously feared. The increase in emissions “should shock even the most jaded negotiators” at international climate talks currently taking place in Bonn, Germany, the UK Guardian reports. But there’s only one problem with this storyline; global temperatures have not increased at all during the past decade.

The evidence is powerful, straightforward, and damning. NASA satellite instruments precisely measuring global temperatures show absolutely no warming during the past the past 10 years. This is the case for the Northern Hemisphere mid-latitudes, including the United States. This is the case for the Arctic, where the signs of human-caused global warming are supposed to be first and most powerfully felt. This is the case for global sea surface temperatures, which alarmists claim should be sucking up much of the predicted human-induced warming. This is the case for the planet as a whole.

If atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions are the sole or primary driver of global temperatures, then where is all the global warming? We’re talking 10 years of higher-than-expected increases in greenhouse gases, yet 10 years of absolutely no warming. That’s 10 years of nada, nunca, nein, zero, and zilch.

The Warming Alarmists have once again cut off the inconvenient part of the their scary story, it used to be CO2 emissions caused global warming which was the enemy, when the alarmists junk science and inaccurate computer models predicted the cause and effect, now they have only the cause, increased emissions, with a now murky sort of effect which needs to be ignored because the cause is emissions.

There is a difference between global warming theory and alarmist global warming theory. Global warming theory holds that certain atmospheric gases warm the earth. Unless other factors intervene, adding more of these gases will tend to warm the atmosphere. This is well accepted across the scientific community. Alarmist global warming theory entails the additional assertion that the earth’s sensitivity to even very modest changes in atmospheric gases is extremely high. This is in sharp scientific dispute and has been repeatedly contradicted by real-world climate conditions.

Most powerfully, global temperature trends during the twentieth century sharply defied atmospheric carbon dioxide trends. More than half of the warming during the twentieth century occurred prior to the post-World War II economic boom, yet atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions rose minimally during this time. Between 1945 and 1977

In the 1970’s we were going to be entering in to a mini ice age, they got that spectacularly wrong, within a decade we were headingtowards increased planetary temperatures, we still are according to the warming alarmists.

Problem is no one told the Sun what is was supposed to do to support the agenda of the unelected one world government and wealth redistribution.

About Tory Aardvark

Climate Realist, Conservative and proud NRA member. I don't buy into the Man Made Global Warming Scam, science is never settled. http://toryaardvark.com @ToryAardvark on Twitter ToryAardvark on Facebook

Posted on June 9, 2011, in Anthropogenic Global Warming, Church Of Climatology, Climategate, COP16, Copenhagen COP15, Green Lies, Green Taxation, Greenpeace, IPCC, ManBearPig, Oh FFS, Social Engineering, Wealth Redistribution and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 7 Comments.

  1. As I am only a mere speck of uneducated sand in the sea of folks in this world, can somebody please explain to me where all the money raised from Carbon Taxes, rising utility bill costs, and all the other extra charges levied by various bodies is actually going?
    Or would it be too cynical to believe it is all a huge fairy-tale in order for the few rich fat cats to get even fatter whilst we all freeze/starve and generally go without essentials?

    • of course it goes into the government coffers to pay for in the case of the last government it goes to pay for all their personal pet projects and in the case of this government it goes to pay off the debts run up by the last government. Very little I suspect goes into sustainable power research.

      • Excellent piece TORYAARDVARK.

        I, similarly to MIBSXX, am a mere speck resting on another speck of unedumcated sand in the sea of environmentally astute folks.

        But, TTS1701, I understand a great deal of government subsidy goes on home insulation and voltaic panels.

        So, here we are in June with April showers – when, in April, we had glorious sunshine – its mother natures global environment roulette.

  2. In 2000 the mean temperatur­e anomaly was .33 C. In 2010 it was .63 C. That’s quite a jump. Of course, you didn’t actually start your graph at 2000, you started it at 1998. 1998 was previously the warmest year on record so if you were deliberate­ly looking to establish a misleading trend line, 1998 is the year you would pick. If you simply compared the decadal average temperatur­es from the 90s and 2000s, the warming trend would be undeniable­.

  3. Please explain to all of us why your graph starts in 1998 and ends in 2008. It is 2011 now and accurate temperature readings are available for 2008-2011. If you want to graph the last decade why not start in 2000 or 2001? Oh, thats right! I forgot in order to make your delusional theory appear accurate you must start with the biggest el nino year (1998) and end during a La Nina…. how stupid of me. After all thats what all good scientists do… cherry-pick the data.

  4. Now we have data on the NASA website up through 2012. Turns out the global surface temps are still flat with no significant increases. That make it 14 years with no warming. All the alarmist computer models show increases; Some as much as 1 degree C. When can we declare the man made global warning models totally false? It seems to me the IPCC and their ilk are now knowingly perpetuating a false hypothesis. That’s called lying.

  1. Pingback: Ten Years On, Er What Happened To The Global Warming? (via Tory Aardvark) | MibsBlog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: