New NASA Data Blows Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
The opening line of an email sent by Kevin Trenberth to Michael E Mann in October 2009 a full year before Climategate broke and the lack of warming has plagued the alarmists ever since.
Now that mostly holy of data sources, NASA has put the whole basis of Climate Religion faith into the meat grinder:
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth’s atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.
Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA’s Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA’s Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
“The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show,” Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. “There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”
In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted.
The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate.
Scientists on all sides of the global warming debate are in general agreement about how much heat is being directly trapped by human emissions of carbon dioxide (the answer is “not much”). However, the single most important issue in the global warming debate is whether carbon dioxide emissions will indirectly trap far more heat by causing large increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds. Alarmist computer models assume human carbon dioxide emissions indirectly cause substantial increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds (each of which are very effective at trapping heat), but real-world data have long shown that carbon dioxide emissions are not causing as much atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds as the alarmist computer models have predicted.
The new NASA Terra satellite data are consistent with long-term NOAA and NASA data indicating atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds are not increasing in the manner predicted by alarmist computer models. The Terra satellite data also support data collected by NASA’s ERBS satellite showing far more longwave radiation (and thus, heat) escaped into space between 1985 and 1999 than alarmist computer models had predicted. Together, the NASA ERBS and Terra satellite data show that for 25 years and counting, carbon dioxide emissions have directly and indirectly trapped far less heat than alarmist computer models have predicted.
Hardly surprising when the warming alarmist models cant even recreate the past events with any accuracy, and even if the alarmist computer models were right it is now politically incorrect to analyse data that disproves the Man Made Climate Change.
Is it any surprise that the public across western industrialised nations is waking and smelling the coffee, at last.
Man Made Climate Change is a political agenda, nothing what so ever to do with Climate Change, it’s all about wealth redistribution and who controls that distribution.
Posted on July 28, 2011, in Anthropogenic Global Warming, Church Of Climatology, Climategate, COP16, COP17, Junk Science and tagged Anthropogenic Global Warming, Church of Climatology, Global Warming, NASA. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.