Rio+20 & What Sustainable Development Really Means

The future for Britain and the industrialised world as "sustainable development" enforced by a one world UN government takes hold. Picture by Jo Turner

The new name for the objectives of what was once called Global Warming, Climate Change, Climate Disruption, Weather Weirding is sustainable development.

Sustainable development is not a new idea, it first featured in Agenda 21 the UN plan for one world government in the 21st Century, which was the outcome of the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.

Now 20 years on the Rio+20 Earth Summit in June has dropped Anthropogenic Global Warming as the driver for its crusade and resuscitated sustainable development, with the added extras of guardians of the future and a new crime of ecocide.

Sustainable development on the face of it sounds a friendly enough idea, and conjures up visions, as it is supposed to do of people replacing trees that are cut down with new trees, but,  and this is the big but of all time, sustainable development means different things to different people.

At the opening of the Rio Earth Summit in 1992:

In his opening remarks at the ceremonies at the Earth Summit, Maurice Strong stated: “The concept of national sovereignty has been an immutable, indeed sacred, principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental cooperation. It is simply not feasible for sovereignty to be exercised unilaterally by individual nation states, however powerful. The global community must be assured of environmental security.”

The call for one world government to oversee sustainable development.

U.N. definition of Sustainable Development:

“meeting today’s needs without compromising future generations to meet their own needs.”

In actuality, Sustainable Development is not sustainable unless the population actually is reduced by the 85% called for by the globalists. The true purpose of Sustainable Development and all of its policies is the control of all aspects of human life — economic, social and environmental (see 3 Es of Sustainable Development further into article).

Here is how the UN described Agenda 21 in one of its own publications in a 1993 article entitled “Agenda 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save our Planet:” “Agenda 21proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by EVERY person on Earth…it calls for specific changes in the activities of ALL people… Effective execution of Agenda 21 will REQUIRE a profound reorientation of ALL humans, unlike anything the world has ever experienced.”

The 3 Es of sustainable development will control every aspect of human life:

The 3Es of sustainability which make up the Sustainable Development logo consists of three connecting circles labeled Social Equity; Economic Prosperity; and Ecological Integrity. These Es together encompass every aspect of human life.

How these people think is best illustrated by some of their quotes from the time:

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsiblity to bring that about?”
– Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme

“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation.”
– Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies

“The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can’t let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”
– Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund

“Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control.”
– Professor Maurice King

The future of a world ruled by people who think the people they rule over are evil and must be eradicated to protect the planet, for the rulers of course, is too terrible to contemplate, yet the world will drift into a Green Dark Age if these people are not stopped.

Encapsulated within the 3 Es are guardians of the future, people who will protect Gaia for the unborn, people of a Liberal Green political leaning will be appointed to suppress economic growth, rollback the progress we have and ensure our children and grandchildren inherit their Green agrarian dream, well those of us that have not been culled for infesting Planet Earth will.

The World Future Council is calling for “ombudspersons for future generations”. These would be guardians appointed at global, national and local levels whose job would be to help safeguard environmental and social conditions by speaking up authoritatively for future generations in all areas of policy-making. This could take the shape of a parliamentary commissioner, a guardian, a trustee or an auditor, depending on how it best fits into a nation’s governance structure. This person would facilitate coherence between the separate pillars of government to overcome single issue thinking, and hold government departments and private actors accountable if they do not deliver on sustainable development goals.

The pompously named World Future Council is just another NGO composed of the usual left leaning Liberal thinkers, an oxymoron I grant you, warming alarmist bandwagon riders and Hollywood champagne environmentalists.

What is never mentioned of course, is who will appoint the guardians of the future.

Big Green Brother took a step close with news that the European Union is planning a satellite to hunt down carbon violators:

One of the big problems with emissions reduction treaties like Kyoto is how to enforce them. Sure countries can pledge to make cuts, but how can you be sure they won’t cheat? It turns out that Europe is working on that.

German warmist website CO2 Handel here tells us how Europe intends to make sure the rest of the world complies fully to climate treaties: Human society will be reduced to color pixels and be constantly watched by a satellite launched and run by climate Eurocrats in Brussels. Carbon Big Brother is coming.

The Green dream of the 15% who are saved inheriting a world free of people, a world only they are fit to live in is getting closer, a world that as the sun goes down will not only look like North Korea from space, but will in reality be North Korea ruled over by a Green Liberal elite who told anyone foolish enough to listen there was problem and they would fix it.

About Tory Aardvark

Climate Realist, Conservative and proud NRA member. I don't buy into the Man Made Global Warming Scam, science is never settled. @ToryAardvark on Twitter ToryAardvark on Facebook

Posted on April 23, 2012, in Anthropogenic Global Warming, Climate Change, Climate Disruption, Fear, Global Warming, Green Environmental Holocaust, Green Lies, Junk Science, Social Engineering, Sustainable Development, Wealth Redistribution and tagged . Bookmark the permalink. 10 Comments.

  1. Is wood bio-mass electricity generation literally cutting Pinocchio’s nose for Timber ?

    Power generation from bio-mass is being spun by the UK government on environmental grounds as it is alleged to cut Co2 emissions by theoretically using a renewable fuel source, yet in truth it represents environmental vandalism on a potentially massive scale. It is already the case that mature timber suitable to be sawn up for use in construction is being chipped into pellets to burn in the various bio-mass boilers already operating in the UK. It could be said that its OK to use off-cuts, but that deprives the chipboard industry of its raw material and thus any subsidy artificially inflates the price of the timber products in general you may find at your local DIY store. Furthermore, the use for wood in energy production also significantly increases the pressure on endangered tropical rain-forests, perhaps to a point where ply-wood imported from rain-forests is made comparatively less expensive compared to our own indigenous chip-board made from previous waste wood. The fact that the fuel for the proposed power station at Hull is to be imported only exports the potential environmental vandalism overseas, it may be the case that the cost of basic essentials in life like toilet roll could also be falsely inflated.

    Its high time to forget the alleged ” Co2 emissions drive run away global warming ” argument and get back to basic ecological principles, using wood bio-mass as a major fuel is little more than a pseudo-green fake ecologist stock market inspired investment scam to soak up any taxpayers subsidy money for corporate interests, and to promote false economic growth in our economy and thereby increase the financial apartheid between rich and poor.

  1. Pingback: Agenda 21: The End of Western Civilization (Part One) – John Malcolm

  2. Pingback: Green Population Analyst Wants To Kill Off 80% Of People « Tory Aardvark

  3. Pingback: Is Rio+20 Sustainable? « Tory Aardvark

  4. Pingback: Alabama Enacts Law To Stop UN Agenda 21 « Tory Aardvark

  5. Pingback: The Creator, Fabricator And Proponent Of Global Warming – Maurice Strong | CACA

  6. Pingback: Obama’s Energy Chief Hails Loss Of Taxpayer Billions A ‘terrific success’ | CACA

  7. Pingback: Shock News : UN Wants To Ban Private Property And Create “Human Habitat Settlement Zones” | CACA

  8. Pingback: United Nations Agenda 21: The Death Knell of Liberty | CACA

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: