COP18 Money, Money In A Warming Alarmist’s World

COP18 Doha 5 days to the end of the conference and no sign of any guilt money from the west or any chance of deal on economic suicide.

COP18 Doha 5 days to the end of the conference and no sign of any guilt money from the west or any chance of deal on economic suicide.

There is always a danger that when repeating your own propaganda and lies, you brainwash yourself into believing your own lies.

Take for example the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS), AOSIS is a coterie of 43 Island nations all cynically repeating the we must prevent a 2°C temperature rise, claiming that their islands are sinking beneath the non rising sea levels, and in the case of the Maldives planning a new airport to be in service long after the islands were allegedly going to disappear.

As COP18 grinds inexorably towards failure, the people attending refuse to acknowledge that there has been no warming for 16 years, a period longer than the warming period that underpins the whole Anthropogenic Global Warming boondoggle.

Negotiations in the Qatari capital continued over the weekend, and texts are expected to emerge on Monday and Tuesday, but poorer states in Africa and the Pacific Islands do not believe these will offer the financial and emission reduction assurances they have been looking for.

“In terms of a stock taking, we have not seen concrete progress on the issues that are important to ensuring the survival of all our members,” said Nauru’s Sai Navoti, lead negotiator for the The Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) bloc of 43 island nations.

“How many COPs do we have to endure where we go back to our constituencies, and say next year we will increase ambition to reduce emissions? Next year we will see finance. Next year we will save the climate. No more next years.”

Time of wake up there is no money, just like there is no warming, no rising sea levels and extreme weather events are on the decrease, go home to and tell your people the truth, it was a great scam and we nearly got you bucket loads of western money, believing we can control the climate is nothing more than 15th Century superstition and wishful thinking.

The Kyoto Protocol ends on December 31st and the list of countries signing up for Commitment Period 2 (CP2) will not include Canada, Japan and New Zealand, Russia’s position is as ever ambiguous and with Obama’s statement that he will address climate change only  if it creates jobs, that is the USA out as well.

Even the EU is less than enthusiastic:

The EU says it cannot offer any firm financial pledges, and will not increase its 2020 target of 20% emission reductions at this round of talks. It also insists that CP2 will run for eight years from 2013-2020, rather than the five-year period AOSIS wants.

Apart from those expecting huge handouts of western money, hoping for personal financial gain, or power, or both and those souls for whom the irrational fear of CO2 has become a belief system there is no populist support for what UN Climate Chief Christian Figueres refers to as ambition and courageous decisions:

Approaching the half-way point of two-week climate talks in Doha, Christiana Figueres, the head of the U.N.’s climate change secretariat, said Friday that she didn’t see “much public interest, support, for governments to take on more ambitious and more courageous decisions.”

No public interest or support for Climate Action, guess that means all those polls at the Guardian and HuffPo saying just about the whole world believed in Man Made Global Warming were wrong or used rigged questions to get the required result.

Whoda thunk it?

About Tory Aardvark

Climate Realist, Conservative and proud NRA member. I don't buy into the Man Made Global Warming Scam, science is never settled. @ToryAardvark on Twitter ToryAardvark on Facebook

Posted on December 3, 2012, in Anthropogenic Global Warming, Church Of Climatology, Climate Change, Fear, Global Warming, Green Lies, Junk Science, ManBearPig, Oh FFS and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. I don’t think the polls were wrong, they just asked the wrong questions, like:

    “Do you think humans elevating atmospheric CO2 levels is a bad thing?”

    rather than

    “How many dollars per week would you sacrifice in return for a .01% drop in atmospheric CO2 levels?”

    It’s easy to get the answers you want if you control the questions AND the analysis.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: