Climategate 2.0 is proving to be more damaging than Climategate despite the usual suspects playing down the importance of Climategate 2.0 and trying the usual “nothing to see here” and saying the real crime is the hacking of UEA’s mail servers, which in no way detracts from the content and importance of the emails.
Despite what the warming alarmists would have us believe, when it suits their argument, weather and climate are not the same things, so it is hardly surprising to find out that junk scientist Phil Jones uses the same computer model for both as email 1840 clearly shows: Read the rest of this entry
The attempt to rehabilitate Phil Jones at the University of East Anglia, following on from Climategate, his deleting data and ignoring FoI requests is picking up speed.
A carefully constructed and acted out inquiry with a pre-ordained outcome white washed Jones of any wrong doing, though he was a bit of a naughty boy for deleting data but Jones did it for noble reasons, so it was all OK really. Read the rest of this entry